CBP's new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) digital portal, scheduled to go live in April 2026, will not process refunds for duty assessments that have already been finalized—only those still in the deposit or estimate phase. For the more than 300,000 companies affected by the Supreme Court's invalidation of Trump administration IEEPA tariffs, this technical limitation creates an immediate gap between what the Court of International Trade has ordered and what CBP's system can actually deliver.
The distinction between finalized and estimated duties matters significantly for compliance engineering teams managing refund workflows. When importers pay tariffs at entry, those payments function as deposits. CBP then has roughly one year to finalize the duty assessment. CAPE's first iteration is designed only to handle the pre-finalization cases, meaning companies with older entries that have already been liquidated must pursue alternative recovery channels—despite the Court of International Trade recently ordering CBP to begin issuing refunds on finalized assessments.
System Integration Note: Teams building automated refund claim workflows should implement logic to segregate entries by liquidation status. CAPE API integrations will need to filter out finalized assessments until CBP releases an updated version of the portal.
Since the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on November 5, 2025, more than 3,000 tariff-related cases have been filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade. However, litigation remains concentrated among larger importers with substantial legal resources. According to international trade attorney Jonathan Todd of Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff, many companies are waiting for CAPE or filing administrative protests with CBP rather than pursuing court action.
Opt-In Requirement: CAPE will require importers to actively request refunds rather than receiving them automatically. Senator Ed Markey and other Democrats have criticized this design, arguing small businesses should not bear additional administrative burden to recover payments the Supreme Court deemed illegal.
For compliance teams managing HTS classification systems, the CAPE rollout introduces timing considerations for rate caching and duty calculation logic. Entries filed under IEEPA tariff codes that remain in estimated status may be eligible for CAPE-based refunds, but systems must accurately track which entries have liquidated. Any rate caching strategy should now account for the bifurcated refund process—CAPE for pending entries, administrative protests or litigation for finalized ones.
James Kim, a customs and international trade attorney at ArentFox Schiff, noted the fundamental uncertainty: "No one really knows for certain what they should be doing because the Supreme Court was completely silent on the whole refund process." A recent KPMG survey found that while 62% of business leaders expect a tariff refund, 25% remain undecided on whether to pursue one.
TradeFacts.io tracks these changes nightly. Start a free 30-day trial.